Friday, October 20, 2006

Losing it in Prague

The November/December issue of Australian Sky & Telescope magazine reports on “the inside story of Pluto’s demotion”, by Owen Gingerich. But you’ll have to buy the mag because it ain’t available online, except for the following teaser:

When rumours began to spread that I would chair a committee for the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to recommend how to define the word “planet”, I promptly received a visitor with an emotional request.

“Don’t demote Pluto,” he pleaded. “Little children love Pluto. They’ll be heartbroken if you tell them Pluto isn’t a planet.”

The next day another caller came by. “Pluto would never have been considered a planet if astronomers had realised, when it was discovered in 1930, that it’s smaller and less massive than the Moon,” he said. “Don’t make the same scientific mistake again.”

I quickly realised that our committee would be treading through a minefield of contrary opinions held by passionate stakeholders. Little did I suspect how that passion would play out!

Also due for publication in the current edition is young Rory Burg’s beautiful Ode to Pluto.

If I can get hold of a copy, I may post more on these and other items.

 
Related Previous Post
211th planetish object discovered

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, Jacob, the poignancy of little 7 year old Rory's poem is very touching.

Out of the mouth of babes! Eh Jacob.

21/10/06 6:02 PM  
Blogger Caz said...

Pluto can still be a planet in our own minds. Science can't dictate planetary affections.

22/10/06 6:17 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home